26 October 2007

What Lies Beyond

I was thinking to list some Things I Resent. Which you're just dying to know. Aren't you.

Funny how the writer places her life at the center of human experience. But what hell if we didn't. It's supreme self-confidence—if by self we mean the writing voice—and Zo sure as fuck is a voice. Frankly, I thought she'd be more raunchy, more kickass—kind of a female rageboy.

But the nice thing about writing voices is that they are who they are, not who you want them to be. They have no neuroses, by definition, whereas you do. Which makes this the healthiest relationship most writers ever know. Sigh. Am I going all Alice Walker-ish? God I hope not. I loathe, in these New Age times, to use words like relationship. Like what I am about to say: this relationship does heal.

I think someone a little less squishy, less Oprah, already said as much: It'll kill you if you don't write it out. Maybe it was Alice. I'll pick on anybody.

One thing I do know: the brain's drive to heal, to recover—in the literal sense, as in finding what was lost—is relentless. Has far more energy than I. Exhausting. What I could do vs. what I do do. A horrifying ratio. Not that I'm judging or anything.

But perhaps this is just another example of What Is The Case. The thoughts being limitless, whereas we are small, flawed and hampered—a.k.a. human.

Like what if you were born with an enormous gift for the dance, broke both legs which mended badly, and found little call for however-talented professional stumblers. Art is funny that way.

What was the subject. Oh, yes. Just this teensy, weensy observation: The web is more than business.

Imagine, if you can, a world without professional bloggers, a term the first time I heard was good for a hoot. Back in the day, maybe six, seven years ago—I don't know, don't ask me about time—you found something in the blackness like Catherine's work (link to come) and were astounded. Now Catherine cannot shine, cannot stagger with her work the way she did then, because Tech is Crunching up the web. Thousands and thousands of little pac-men, operating under the always-distasteful assumption there's no one out there but them.

Never mind, for the moment, that PodTech is going under—and what a shocker that is. There seem to be any number of people who, so far as I can tell, really don't do anything at all. I've searched in vain for what it is they present in in all those Presentations, for which one simply must fly to Europe tomorrow, oh drat. Though I gather, it is often in order present the (really complex) idea of blogging to, shudder, corporations.

My, that was refreshing; a dip in self-pity always is. But have you noticed, the more cleanly you slice the personal, the more you speak to the universal, to the larger life we all lead. If there is one thing the writer banks upon, it is this strange truth that the small is also the unimaginably enormous. Like a pea rolling around inside the Hindenberg—and oh my god, what a way of travel that was. Take your trips to Europe over several days of strolling the promenade deck and peering down at the ocean from a thousand feet. No, there's not going to be any explosion. Just, the personal is the political. (Like that? I just made it up.)

And the politics that result from this awful confluence of professional wing-nuts and the corporation? Teh Suxxor.

Hell-o, TechDirt, you ain't the whole web, you and your kind. I'm thinking, “Take Back The Blogs.” A new movement. Viral as all hell.

What a radical notion. Do something, midst consumer-nation, for absolutely free. Refuse to be (shudder #2) monetized. Lend weight to the idea of the real. To the life that lies beyond Adsense.

Techdirt: “Ultimately, the most meaningful measure of a site or service is its profitability, which, unlike page views or time spent, isn't so easily gamed.”

Steaming. When my father was a boy, those piles were called Road Apples.

19 October 2007

For Love of The Dance

I'm going to shoot myself. This week, anyway., Something called websitegrader rated the readability of this blog:

Readability Level : Advanced Degree (PhD)

This score measures the approximate level of education necessary to read and understand the web page content.

On the other hand, I guess that confers a certain intelligence—hell, if U can read this, U R a Ph D.

Or, hey, this is a good bet: All that miserable Jakob Nielsen Chunk your Content crap has bred a nation of chunk-inhalers. Who do not read but ...engorge. Snake-like. Take in the content perfectly whole, because the jawbones of the mind come easily unhinged. Whether that rat-shaped bulge will actually be digested ... is anybody's guess.

The English sentence is a lovely, intricate dance, one that emanates meaning as richly as a lover's deep look.

With every period and comma ... those marks for the human pause, the human breath.

When the language goes, I go too.

15 October 2007

Grace Paley's Big Unusual Life

Grace Paley


“In Grace’s first story,
Goodbye and Good Luck,
a suitor offers the narrator,
‘a big new free happy unusual life.’
I think that’s the life that Grace had.
May we all.”


— from eulogy
to Grace Paley
by Barbara Selfridge

14 October 2007

Some Following Seas

So I'm thinking maybe I'll set up a blog called Shelley! One could make a career of it, the woman is fairly awash in interesting thoughts, gorgeous photos—very talented photographer—stimulating comments, fab links.

Whoa.  Could it be ... am I ...is this ... following ?

Naw, what I am is a fan, a true fan.

Besides, I kinda doubt Shelley is anywhere that totes up Followers; she undoubtedly loathes the concept as much as do I—as does anyone in their right mind—and, really (you could at least pretend surprise) I make a piss-poor follower.

Somebody, fill me in. Was it Twitter that started the whole Follow thing? ... Scoble? ... Facebook? (Gee thanks, Zuck, but I already did adolescence.)

I think it was a big mistake, opening Fuckbook, sorry, Facebook, to adults. As Shelley says,

I bet if we did a count of how many times people use the many applications they install, or how often people continue to use Facebook after the initial 'gee wiz' phase, we wouldn't be talking about it being worth billions. Or even millions.

Hell, the upcoming Facebook debacle may usher in the Big Burst of the Dot Com Bubble, Ought Eight.

Hey, I've been right before.

Following Sea:  A dangerous sea conditions in which the direction of the waves and swells is the same direction that the boat is moving.

Oh lord. Just found this on Valleywag:

Less than three months after Robert Scoble declared, “Facebook is the modern day rolodex,” the blogger is lamenting the social network's contact limitations. “Damn I wish I hadn't locked my rolodex in this trunk.”

Bye bye, Marky-Mark.

10 October 2007

Faceless

She says she gets it. I think she does get it. I get it too. You get it, right?

I sure as hell do. That Jeneane girl is all earnestness. And as I have told you, if you had only been paying attention, earnestness is a disappearing precious natural resource. It means, among other things, Unspoiled. On the Interwebs? Yes, even here. It means True.

True-talking, and unabashed to be so.

In other words, to know and love Jeneane—which is to say, to appreciate her as she is—you must turn your back on all this post-modern crap. Irony is useless. There's no protection. It's like asking men to remove their armor, and walk into battle unprotected.

Yes it is. For all of us ... except me, of course. Because I have been battered about the head for long enough, I Let Go. You can think me any fool you want. I love the girl unabashedly ...

And what does this all have to do with that miserable fuckin' waste of time Facebook? I get to say miserable because I am an adult.

Not a college kid looking to hook up—a term conveying such a monster burden of sadness and the wrong, I'd have to write another book and I don't want to.

But I will offer the Thought Of The Day. Let not the fifteen billion (or whatever absurd hell it's up to now) obscure one simple truth: Facebook is not a platform. It's hookup engine.



Jeneane goes on to quote Kara Swisher (see Kara's whole url.)

...if that is all there is, can Facebook really build a viable and long-lasting business on what is essentially a bunch of games that will ultimately become wearying for users? Doesn’t it need more robust apps that actually are useful and relevant and make Facebook the service that Zuckerberg has often told me was a 'utility'?

And there you have it. Two great women, doubting themselves (as well as deftly turning that doubt into public question) ... and one mendacious man. (He really used the word Utility? Lying little shit.)

Why does the male lie so.

Money, honey.

Simple as that. The stone at the center. The bitter, bitter pill.

And Then There Were Two

This anonymous comment on Secret Diary of Steve Jobs really faked me out ... so cool, so coolly evil at the same time.

I've always wanted to ask Paul, So how do you feel about the fact that the Beatles are dying in order of coolness, and there's only you and Ringo left?

You are genius-bad. Whoever you are.

07 October 2007

The Profane (Sacred Later)

But making explicit doesn’t just do damage to selves.

Remember what I wrote about the explicit? Neither do I, but I'm looking. Meanwhile, turns out David Weinberger said it better anyway. Okay, maybe not better, but isn't that the charm of someone else's words, they seem to nail what you cannot, which is one of the reasons we love them.

In general, making explicit does violence to what is being made explicit. (In the modern age, Heidegger gets credit for this idea.) Making things explicit isn’t like unearthing an archaeological find that’s just been sitting there, waiting to be dug up. Making explicit often—usually—means disambiguating and reducing complexity.

The reason is simple. The things of the world exist as they are only within deep, messy, inarticulate, shifting, continuous, fuzzy contexts. This is certainly true of human relationships, although I believe it’s also true of all that we find on the earth, waiting in it, or promised above it. The analog world—the real world—is ambiguous. That’s a source of its richness. In making a piece of it explicit, we make it less ambiguous and thus lose some of its value and truth.

 
border