26 September 2005

Why Am I Surprised

I would like to say to Cindy Sheehan and her supporters: Don't be a group of unthinking lemmings, said Mitzy Kenny of Ridgeley, W.Va., whose husband died in Iraq last year. She said the anti-war demonstrations ‘can affect the war in a really negative way. It gives the enemy hope.’

The Enemy.

That would be like, the Japs, the Krauts, the Gooks ... the goddamn Redcoats, I presume?

Dream on.

I, for one, can't think of a faster way to lose. And I don't mean just this nasty little faux war. Mitzy.

18 September 2005

Don: The Human Touch

Today, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld arrived in Louisiana and toured a medical facility at the New Orleans international airport. He spoke to and shook hands with military and rescue officials, but walked right by a dozen refugees lying on stretchers just feet away from him, most of them extremely sick or handicapped, Reuters reported.

Think of the germs alone.

14 September 2005

Nibbled to Death by Mickey Kaus

“Krugman's argument appears to be that they shouldn't negotiate because Bush's starting position is unacceptable. It usually is in negotiations!”

You jerk! You little towel-snapping jerk! This is where it's happenin', blog-central, nut to nut, ball to ball! I hate snappy journalism! I loathe and despise the part of the male brain that is stuck in the moist fumbling heat of locker room! For life!

No, not hate. It's just tedious as hell. But then, I'm a big believer in life beyond snappy. In amusement beyond cheap, in high beyond adrenaline, in news beyond stirring the lowest, shittiest pot. In a national narrative that reflects the way people really live. One they choose, not the boy-crap foisted upon them. Insurgents all. I wish.

link:slate

"I Take Full Responsibility"


I'm just curious, George—what were the other choices?

13 September 2005

Neatest Trick of The Week

Former Sen. and Attorney General John Ashcroft, providing commentary for CNN, said at one point Monday afternoon that there were just two things that Roberts shouldn't have to address: the future or the past.

11 September 2005

Apropos

cassiopaea asks:

Is the difference one that exists between people who are willing to face the ‘terror of the situation’ and those who simply cannot live in the state of tension produced by having to make moral decisions?

Yes.

10 September 2005

Part of the Stench

“Rats on the West Side, bedbugs uptown / What a mess! This town's in tatters / I've been shattered,” Mick Jagger sang in 1978.

Midge Decter woke up the morning after the night of looting during the New York blackout of 1977 feeling as if she had “been given a sudden glimpse into the foundations of one's house and seen, with horror, that it was utterly infested and rotting away.”

Oh dear. Someone thinks we care what Midge Decter felt? Ever?

Worse, they think this in the same paragraph with Mick Jagger?

When cultural galaxies collide.

These things are not to be handled lightly, my dear Mr. Brook—oops. Watching Mr. Brooks' little bio videos on the New York Times, I see that he is exactly the sort of person to handle these things lightly, as well as being perhaps the only person on earth to whom this coupling would occur.

It is a strange world. I dislike the neocons. (Do they want to be capitalized?) Just as I dislike anyone who takes a false position, which is to say, one with hidden (albeit perfectly obvious) motives.

I'll pose you a question: The Astrodome? How many “neocons” were in the crowd?

End of story. It really is.

No matter how likable or bright—even forgiving the Midge–Mick thing—I already know I do not care for Mr. Brooks. I like honest people, and politics like his, like that of all the neocons, exist for one reason, and one reason alone: that the rich get richer—and when that makes the poor get poorer . . . lie about it.

In other words, the morality of neocon politics just plain stinks.

Quack

If ever there was a moment for America to show itself the 'humble nation' that President Bush so mendaciously promised in 2000, this is it. But humility is not in this administration's gene pool. Its nature is to lecture and lord it over others.

Even Katrina, which turned a major American city into Mogadishu and laid bare the shameful divisions of wealth, class and colour in the US for all the world to see, is unlikely to dent its sense of righteousness in its foreign policy.

But reality cannot forever be denied, even by this White House which for so long has lived in a universe in which everything is going swimmingly in Iraq, where tax cuts answer all problems, and where global warming does not exist.

Katrina, and the initial shambolic response of the government to the calamity, have changed everything.

For the world, US preaching, US leadership, even US power ring hollow. Back home, a quarter-century era of anti-government is surely coming to an end. President Bush could rise to the occasion by recognising this.

More probably he will not. So then he will spend out his time in office as the lamest of lame ducks, disavowed even by those in his party who realise that his way of doing things does not work.

Neatly said. Those Brits don't mince words. Nice to know that elsewhere on the globe, meaning remains intact.

09 September 2005

OFCS

The Blogosphere Left doesn't care about the levees, or emergency response plans, or the logistical challenge of completely evacuating a city of 500,000, or the ugly repercussions when this is not done.

Bush hatred among the pathological Left just is. It doesn't have a cause.


What in god's name is someone really after when he spouts witless shit like this?

It's all over the fucking blogosphere, (a word I have come to loathe) and WTF is the problem? This is like parading your stupidity: “I have no clue what you people are up to ... so it must be nothing.” Yeah, that's it. Liberals offer their critique not because they care, but just to exercise their gums.

Tell me, now, does this not bespeak an astonishing lack of imagination?

Naw. I know what they're doing, the guys who write this crap. Trying desperately to invalidate. Erase. As I have moaned before—and shall doubtless moan again—where in hell is my worthy opponent? Or do you all have some sort of communication disorder, a la Georgie? I think there must be millions of us starved for discussion.

I'd like to know where assholes like Ruffini are coming from. I don't think it has a damn thing to do with politics, but I'd like to know. I'd like to know how it contributes, to fuck with the narrative this way. It is my belief that great and lasting harm is done. The Patrick Ruffinis make big noise, but what they're revealing is the barren nature of their inner content.

Men churning out ugliness. Now there's a novel sight.

OMG, his favicon is a tiny photo of ... himself.

07 September 2005

Oh They Do, Do They

As William Kristol writes in the Weekly Standard, nominating the ‘mediocre’ Gonzales would be a way for Bush to lose conservatives who are already going soft on the president anyway. Kristol says a Gonzales nomination ‘would utterly demoralize’ many of Bush's supporters, ‘who are sticking with him and his party, through troubles in Iraq and screw-ups with Katrina, precisely because they want a few important things out of a Bush presidency—and one of these is a more conservative court.’

Well tough darties, sweetie. “Conservative” translates to a lowering and lessening of everything decent people hold dear—and you lot haven't the brains to pull it off.

People hate what's happened in New Orleans.

The only thing money-grubbers know is zero-sum. And that, my bunnies, is the thinking of a child.

So last-century. So “boy.” So un-smart, as the earth warms and fossil fuels peter out.

The only relatively smart thing that has been accomplished is—well, you see just how prepared the impoverished are to hold the Marxist flame to privileged butts. Was the time-lag just to be rid of a big chunk of ‘em, Democratic voters all? I wouldn't put it past that crew in Washington, and I hate that I've come to think it possible. It is possible. Watch Georgie lie some more. Oh yeah, a more “conservative court” would be just swell. If you didn't happen to need an abortion. Or be born with a fucking silver spoon in your mouth.

I dated Yalies, albeit a little older than Georgie's peers. Duds, every one.

06 September 2005

Come The Revolution, Barbs

Then she added: “What I'm hearing, which is sort of scary, is they all want to stay in Texas. Everyone is so overwhelmed by the hospitality.

And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this—this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them.”

. . . I'd be hiding my sorry Republican ass, were I you. Sigh. Where are Huey and Bobby, those gutsy, scary kids . . .

I know! Let's leave Barbs in the Astrodome with all them chucklin' darkies!

I don't know, this kind of noblesse oblige crap just bites my ass. About as cut off from real life as Marie Antoinette—and not remotely as interesting.

04 September 2005

My Pet Goat: The Sequel


Yes, yes ... that's it! I take no credit for the idea; it belongs to Greg Mitchell of Editor & Publisher, but this magnificent title needs no dribbling on afterward; (sorry, Mitchell, but I'm afraid you're of the Eyes Glaze Over school of writing. If it's any consolation, it is a really big school.)

What's more, however unreadable ... politically, offensiveness-wise? Head and shoulders above the buzz-machine towel-snappers, trust me.

Of course that's not writing, either.

But whoa, thank you, again. Perfect explanation. As would be Stunned With A Cattle Prod ... but we know the truth, don't we: No Battery Pack, No Speak.

I was going to harp on this Broken thing, but Maureen Dowd came pretty damn close to nailing it, today. The whole clueless bunch. It isn't stupidity, it isn't callousness, (well, it is callousness) it isn't anything you think.

God, I love it. The only Right Thing in the whole catastrophe: this is The Sequel.

02 September 2005

Gather At The River

“Today, as the President comes to Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi for his ceremonial trip to look at the victims of the devastation, he would do well to have a plan more significant than a ceremonial tour.”

”His whole response is unacceptable.”

“How can blacks be locked out of the leadership, and trapped in the suffering?”

“It is that lack of sensitivity and compassion that represents a kind of incompetence.”

“There's a historical indifference to the pain of poor people and black people in this country.”

—Rev. Jesse Jackson

An indifference just a little bit shredded, today.

Poverty has always cut such clear lines. Privilege bought the means to turn away.

The flood like some dark baptismal rite—the left-behind rendered vividly human.

Shall we all join hands, while Rev. Jackson leads us. Leads us.